Is Simon Dorante-Day the love child of Charles and Camilla? Wikipedia bio and DNA test results
Simon Dorante-Day, who lives in Queensland, Australia, says he is the secret child of King Charles III and Camilla. He said that for years. Now that the queen is dead, he gave new information about the DNA paternity test.
Simon Dorante-Day may not be as popular as Camilla, Prince Charles or Queen Elizabeth II. But his shocking claims about King Charles III have been making headlines around the world for years.
Dorante-Day, believed to be the secret love child of Prince Charles III and Camilla, recently opened up about his DNA paternity case.
Simon has long said he is linked to the royal family. In an interview with Australian newspaper 7NEWS, Simon defended his claims.
After the death of Queen Elizabeth II, he added a new twist to his story.
Simon Dorante-Day
Simon Dorante-Day’s Wikipedia: His Family History
Simon Dorante-Day was born in Gosport, Portsmouth, UK. He was raised in Queensland. Karen and David Day, who lived nearby, took him in when he was eight months old.
According to 7news, her two adoptive grandparents, Winifred and Ernest Bowden, worked in the royal households of the Queen and Prince Philip. Ernest Bowden received an Imperial Service Award.
Dorante-research Day’s shows Charles and Camilla first became close in 1965. It says Charles was taken to Australia and Camilla disappeared from social media in Britain for at least nine months after that, i.e. before the birth of Charles.
Additionally, one historian says the hospital listed on his birth certificate as the place where he was born had no babies in the ten years before he was born.
Simon Dorante-Day DNA test results: Is he Charles and Camilla’s love child?
Simon Dorante-Day is believed to be the secret child of Prince Charles III and Camila. His DNA paternity case has now been made public.
He had already made headlines with his statements, which he said were the result of decades of research.
He’s been telling people for a long time that he’s Charles and Camilla’s son. Dorante-Day says her adoptive grandmother worked for Queen Elizabeth. He said she told him Charles and Camilla were his real parents on his deathbed.
Since he was born in 1966, it’s likely he was conceived before Charles and Diana married. Many people think Charles and Camilla met in 1970, but Dorante-Day says that’s not true.
Dorante-Day also believes that Charles and Camilla gave him to the staff so they could raise him. He also said how sad he was to lose his ‘grandmother’ after the death of Queen Elizabeth.
He had also previously said that he had tried to write a letter to the queen, hoping that she would respond, but his attempt had failed.
Dorante-Day has since said he wants Charles and Camilla’s DNA tested in court. In an interview with 7News, he said he had spoken with lawyers about filing a lawsuit against the king.
Additionally, Dorante-Day had previously tried to take the case to court, but failed. He thinks this time things will be different.
Simon Dorante-Day
How old is Simon Dorante-Day?
In 2022, Simon Dornte-Day will be 56 years old. He was born in Gosport, Portsmouth, UK on April 5, 1966.
He has spent over ten years trying to prove that he is an heir to the British throne and that he is a Blue Blood.
It is interesting that he began to claim it long before Charles III became king.
Simon Dorante-Day strikes back
1. Grandfather Price Debate
Dorante-Day claimed that her grandfather, Ernest Bowlden, had received an Imperial Service Medal and that her adoptive grandparents, Winifred and Ernest Bowlden, had both worked for the Queen and Prince Philip.
Dorante-Day first heard of his royal parents from his grandmother Winifred.
My grandmother and I were quite close, and she often reminded me that I was Camilla and Charles’ child, the man said.
She didn’t just imply it; she was frank with me. She was always quite protective because she was worried about my safety and the consequences if it came out.
However, presenter Philip Schofield and royal biographer Robert Jobson slammed Dorante-Day in a recent UK TV interview, saying there was no evidence Ernest Bowlden ever received a service medal. imperial.
However, Dorante-Day has provided evidence in the form of a photo of the award which is displayed at her adoptive parents.
Ernest Bowlden has been honored for his 25 years of service to the English prison system.
After working as a gardener on one of the Queen’s estates, where he first met his future wife Winifred, Her Majesty’s Chief, he entered the Prison Service.
Ernest Bowlden was on the list of 1963 winners, according to government documents from the time.
According to Dorante-Day, “I found it in the archives of the London Gazette, it’s clearly stated in black on white.”
It’s not hard to find, as my fans on Facebook also discovered.
There is no doubt in this situation because the date on the corner of the award, which comes from the home of my adoptive mother Karen Day, matches the date on the newspaper article.
Charles and Camilla’s ‘Australian son’ is shaken by Charlotte’s new evidence.
2. When Charles and Camilla first met
For many years there has been much speculation among royal writers and correspondents about the exact day Charles and Camilla first met.
Four separate years, from 1969 to 1972, have been cited in various articles and books as the couple’s “first meeting”.
Last week, New Zealand broadcasters Jono and Ben of The Hits were told by British royal writer Gavin Gray that they ‘didn’t think’ Charles and Camilla ‘were together’ when Dorante-Day was conceived.
Dorante-Day, however, opines that there is enough reason to suspect that they met long before that.
According to Dorante-Day, “the fact that royal biographers and novelists have provided such radically divergent stories of their first meeting proves that none of them really know what they are talking about”.
“This ‘initial meeting’ has been recorded as having taken place in 1969, 1970, 1971 and 1972, so they are not merely a day or a month apart.
“What we do know is that in March 1965 Camilla was introduced to London society. Charles was spotted in London in 1965 and they frequented the same high society quarters.
So it stands to reason that they would have met in early 1965, after he was introduced to the company.
“Charles also visited Camilla’s hometown in 1963 when she was enrolled in a Swiss graduate school. They therefore lived in the same place in 1963 and participated in the London social scene in 1965.
There are sufficient reasons to believe that this first encounter did not take place between 1969 and 1972.
3. Camilla “didn’t appear pregnant” in March 1965
Gavin Grey, a British royal correspondent, also revealed to New Zealand radio DJs Jono and Ben that Camilla appears to have a flat stomach in footage taken in March 1965.
He told the radio hosts: ‘In fact, there is footage showing her going to a debutante ball in London on March 25, 1965, which is around the time he is talking about, and she is not is obviously not pregnant.
And she appears in various photographs taken throughout 1965. I’m not saying he’s wrong; there are only elements that hinder its progress in the events.
Dorante-Day, however, said he was “disappointed” by this “inaccurate” remark.
He added: “They have to do their math.”
“Since I was born in April 1966, my conception must have taken place around July 1965, less nine months.
Why, then, do they expect Camilla to appear pregnant in March 1965? The debutante ball, which was on her birthday in July rather than March, I believe you’ll find out too.
“My investigation proved that Camilla disappeared from the social scene between August 1965 and June 1966, during which time she allegedly carried me,” he continued.
And Charles was deported to Australia in December 1965 until I was born in April 1966.
4. Why don’t you just do a DNA test?
In interviews and on social media, critics frequently ask Dorante-Day why he didn’t take a DNA test to back up his claims to be a prince, according to Dorante-Day.
Because that’s obviously what I’ve worked so hard to try to achieve, it always amuses me when people ask me that, he told 7NEWS.com.au.
“I have been fighting in court for three years to get Charles and Camilla to agree to a DNA test. Since media coverage of Family Court proceedings is illegal in Australia, my actions have not been widely publicized.
discovered is new link between Prince Andrew and Charles and Camilla’s ‘Australian son’
But despite the slowness of the legal process, I am not giving up. My case was referred to Family Court by the Australian High Court when I filed a petition there, and it will do so again in the coming months.
“I am also looking for legal counsel in the UK so that I can continue my fight abroad.
Given that I will eventually have to go to court, I am not interested in doing DNA testing with other distant royals. I want this to be handled properly in court.
5. Family resemblance
According to Dorante-Day, he also receives criticism from people over images showing similarities between him, his children and members of the royal family.
They think that’s the core of my thesis and that I don’t have any other research to back up my claims, he said.
They are so far from the truth, however. I have taken a very cautious approach to learning the truth since my grandmother informed me that Charles and Camilla were my parents.
“I never just assumed that because she said it, it had to be true. Without a doubt. I went there and did my own research, talked to historians and went through documents. Every path I took led me back to Charles and Camilla.
“But it was another piece of the puzzle when my children were born and my wife Elvianna and I noticed the parallels. However, as I often point out, there are still a lot of missing pieces.
According to Dorante-Day, a recent photo comparison between Dorante-younger Day’s child, Meriam, and Prince Charlotte has sparked a lot of curiosity.
He remarked, “I’ve never seen such a reaction on Facebook. “I just uploaded a photo of Meriam to celebrate her birthday, and hundreds of people commented saying they couldn’t believe how much she looked like Princess Charlotte.”
But it’s important to remember that while DNA is the only conclusive evidence, courts still consider facial and skeletal similarities when determining paternity.
“Facial features, structure, throat, ears and position can all be taken into account.”
